Case Reports
Cotterhill Hitcham Solicitors LLP v Guest (CA) 22/11/16
Where neither party had directed evidence to the issue of whether a solicitors’ firm had acted in breach of duty by failing to […]
Articles by LBU Editorial
Cartoons
Monday morning with Alex Williams’ cartoons
This cartoon is by Alex Williams who draws the Queen’s Counsel cartoons for The Times and in numerous books including The Queen’s Counsel […]
Case Reports
Mir Shakil-Ur-Rahman v (1) ARY Network Ltd (2) Fayaz Ghafoor [2016] EWHC 3110 (QB), Sir David Eady, 2 December 2016
C brought a claim in libel and harassment. C was the head of the Jang group of companies, the largest media group in […]
Cartoons
Monday morning with Alex Williams’ cartoons
This cartoon is by Alex Williams who draws the Queen’s Counsel cartoons for The Times and in numerous books including The Queen’s Counsel […]
Case Reports
Surrogacy – X (A Child) (No. 2) (Private Surrogacy Arrangement: Contact with Birth Family)
Another interesting case dealing with a surrogacy arrangement “which unraveled, causing great and intense heartache for all”. This reported case is not a […]
Cartoons
Monday morning with Alex Williams’ cartoons
This cartoon is by Alex Williams who draws the Queen’s Counsel cartoons for The Times and in numerous books including The Queen’s Counsel […]
Case Reports
Victoria Plum (t/a Victoria Plumb) v Victorian Plumbing Ltd & Ors, Ch Div (Henry Carr J), 18/11/16
The claimant bathroom retailer had successfully made out a case for infringement of its UK registered trade mark VICTORIA PLUMB based on the […]
Case Reports
Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Ltd (SC) 26/10/16
A finance company’s claim in relation to a funding agreement with a solicitors’ firm was outside the scope of the firm’s professional indemnity […]
Cartoons
Monday morning with Alex Williams’ cartoons
This cartoon is by Alex Williams who draws the Queen’s Counsel cartoons for The Times and in numerous books including The Queen’s Counsel […]
Case Reports
Carrimjee v FCA (UT) 20/10/16
The Upper Tribunal considered its jurisdiction under FSMA s. 133 (6) and (6A) in relation to a non-disciplinary reference, in circumstances where the […]