The CA refused a Father’s appeal against an order for professionally supervised contact only and a s.91(14) bar on further applications. The CA allowed his appeal in respect of an order that he pay outstanding costs of an ISW the jurisdictional basis of the order being wanting.
Latest News
- [ 16/02/2023 ] What Does Pelvic Mesh Do, And Why Are Women Suing Over It? – Explainer News
- [ 26/10/2022 ] Taylor v Legal and General Partnership Services Ltd 7/10/22 (Ch) Case Reports
- [ 19/10/2022 ] Colombia Pictures Industries, Inc & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Ors, Ch Div (Meade J) 17/7/22 Case Reports
- [ 22/07/2022 ] Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Ltd v Simply Construct (UK) LLP [2022] EWCA Civ 823 (21 June 2022) Case Reports
- [ 07/07/2022 ] Do I Need a Lawyer to File a Defense Base Act Claim? News
© Law Brief Publishing Ltd, all rights reserved. Published by Law Brief Publishing Ltd, company number 05966609, registered in the UK. Registered office address: 30 The Parks, Minehead, Somerset, TA24 8BT.
All information on this site was believed to be correct at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own and do not necessarily indicate the views of Law Brief Publishing Ltd.. Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances. Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.